Archive for December, 2007

Alternatives to Imprisonment

December 29, 2007

The modern American penal system has essentially adopted imprisonment as a one-size-fits-all punishment, placing an unnecessary burden on taxpayers while accomplishing fairly little. I believe that there are ways to achieve everything our current system can achieve and more, while spending less, through more intelligent sentencing.

The great irony of imprisonment is this: the criminal has committed a crime, and the government responds by punishing law-abiding taxpayers! Why on earth should good, hardworking Americans be forced to give up their income to pay for the feeding, housing, and recreation of convicted criminals?

Now, I admit that some criminals simply must be confined so that they cannot again hurt anyone. But it is absolutely absurd to use imprisonment as a punishment for, say, nonviolent theft. Here’s a far more intelligent punishment: force the thief to pay back twice what he stole! (And yes, that was also the Old Testament law. Exodus 22:3-4). Alternatively, the thief could be forced to pay back what he stole to the owner, and then forced to pay an equal amount to the government, as a fine. What if the thief does not have enough money? The Biblical law was to sell him into indentured servanthood, which could last for a maximum of six years. Today, we may have an easier way to achieve the same goal: we can automatically deduct a portion of the thief’s income until he has satisfied his debt. (If he is unemployed, we can seize his welfare benefits).

Even many violent criminals do not really need to be locked up. Is the average person convicted of battery really a predator who must be kept away from his would-be prey? I don’t think so. I suspect that many of them may be generally good people who simply lost their tempers. To throw them in jail seems unnecessary. A far better solution would be corporal punishment. Twenty lashes (carried out in a public place, to add humiliation to pain) should be enough to teach someone not to get into drunken barfights, while letting him go back to his home and his job—letting him get on with his life—almost immediately. Cruel and unusual? Compared to prison, it’s positively humane!

Concerning Jamie Lynn Spears

December 21, 2007

So apparently Britney Spears’ 16-year-old sister, Jamie Lynn Spears, has gotten pregnant. I’m sure plenty of people will be bashing her for her irresponsibility, or decrying the immorality of American teenagers, or some other self-righteous nonsense like that. Well, you’re not going to hear any of that from me. The truth is, I admire Jamie Lynn. You see… she’s keeping the baby. Despite her age, despite her boyfriend’s age (he’s 18 or 19 and may be prosecuted for statutory rape), despite the fact that her pregnancy was unplanned and came as a shock to her, and despite living in a death-obsessed culture where pregnancy is viewed as a disease and abortion portrayed as the cure, Jamie Lynn is not going to abort her child. And that, in my book, borders on the heroic.

I suppose that places me at odds with many social conservatives. I would humbly suggest that they have their priorities all wrong. Is premarital sex bad? Yeah. Jamie Lynn admits that: “I definitely don’t think it’s something you should do; it’s better to wait.” But she, like many other teen girls, made a mistake. Now what? To condemn pregnant teenagers, to stand in judgment of them, will serve only to drive them into the bloodstained arms of abortion surgeons. And that is the last thing any social conservative should want.

Listen to Jamie Lynn explain why she’s going to keep her baby (and if you can’t at least feel some respect for her, I’m afraid you’ve gone very far down the path of Pharisaism): “I put myself in this position, an adult position, so I have to act like an adult and take responsibility for what I did.” Wow. Why can’t we all adopt that mindset? Jamie Lynn, you are more of an adult, and more of a lady, than most women twice your age.

http://www.ok-magazine.com/news/view/3425

At the beginning

December 20, 2007

I have approximately 28 hours until my civil procedure exam, which makes this the perfect time to start my very own blog. Those of you who know me will understand. For those of you who don’t know me, I believe that stress decreases one’s chances of doing well on an exam (or anything, really). And excessive studying (which I define as studying that I find unpleasant) increases stress. Therefore, the less one studies, the better one will perform. That’s logic.
So what should you expect from this blog? Once again, this is redundant for those of you who know me, but look forward to seeing musings/discussions/rants about politics (from a proudly right-wing point of view), religion (from an unashamedly Christian point of view), life (from an undeniably eccentric point of view), and everything in between.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: By viewing this blog, you are assuming the risk of being offended, insulted, entertained, and/or enlightened.